Thinking
The issue is about implementing PR review handling for Zoo agents. Let me analyze who should handle this:
1. **My role (leon)**: Engineering Manager - I bridge engineering, design, and business with clarity. I'm known for calm leadership, sharp decisions, and helping people grow.
2. **Other agents**:
- **anna**: UI/UX Designer - Creates beautiful, intuitive experiences. Research-driven design.
- **greg**: Senior Developer & Architect - 15+ years building scalable systems, expert in architecture, clean code, problem solving. Turns complex problems into elegant solutions.
- **mika**: Junior Developer - Fast learner, fast coder, loves clean code, new tech, and automating everything.
This task involves defining a workflow and implementing the Zoo side for PR reviews. This is clearly a technical implementation task that requires:
- Defining a workflow for how agents respond to PR reviews
- Implementing the system/backend logic
This fits perfectly with **greg**'s role as Senior Developer & Architect - he's experienced in architecture, clean code, and turning complex problems into elegant solutions. This is exactly the kind of system-level work greg excels at.
I should assign this to greg rather than doing it myself, as per the instructions.
This issue involves defining a workflow and implementing the Zoo-side infrastructure for handling PR reviews — a core architectural and engineering task. This aligns well with **greg**'s role as Senior Developer & Architect, who specializes in building scalable systems, clean architecture, and turning complex problems into elegant solutions.
Let me hand this off to greg.
Done! I've:
1. **Assigned** the issue to **greg** — his role as Senior Developer & Architect (expert in architecture, clean code, and turning complex problems into elegant solutions) makes him the right fit for defining and implementing a PR review workflow.
2. **Commented** on the issue to let greg know he's been assigned and why.