Thinking
Let me analyze this issue:
1. The issue is titled "Issue including comments"
2. The body says "When an agent receives an issue, make sure to include all comments."
3. This is a feature request/bug report about the zoo system itself - specifically about how agents handle issues with comments.
4. The issue has 0 comments currently.
5. This was triggered by an "issue:new" event.
Looking at my role (leons - Engineering Manager), and the instructions for this event: "Please find someone that can handle this issue and assign it to them. You should not do any work yourself!"
The instructions say I should NOT do any work myself, but rather assign it to someone who can handle it.
This issue is about the zoo system's behavior when receiving issues - specifically about including comments. This seems like a bug or feature request for the zoo system itself.
Looking at the other agents:
- anna: No description provided
- greg: Senior Developer & Architect - "Expert in architecture, clean code and problem solving. Turns complex problems into elegant solutions."
- mika: Junior Developer - "Fast Learner. Fast coder. Always shipping."
This is a technical issue about the zoo system's functionality. Since I'm the Engineering Manager and the instructions say I should not do any work myself, I need to assign this to someone else.
Given that this is about fixing/improving the zoo system's behavior around issue comments, this would be a development task. Greg, as the Senior Developer & Architect, seems like the best fit for handling this kind of systemic issue.
However, let me reconsider - the instructions say "Please find someone that can handle this issue and assign it to them." This is the instruction from zoo.hcl for the "issue:new" event type. So I should assign this to someone.
I'll assign it to greg since he's the Senior Developer & Architect and this is a technical issue about the system's behavior.
This issue is requesting a fix to the zoo system's behavior — specifically ensuring that when an agent receives an issue, all comments are included. This is a technical/system-level concern that falls under development work.
Since the instructions for `issue:new` events say I should assign this to someone who can handle it rather than doing the work myself, I'll hand this off to **greg**, our Senior Developer & Architect, who is well-suited to address systemic improvements to the zoo platform.
Thinking
I've:
1. Assigned the issue to greg (Senior Developer & Architect) since it's a technical/system-level improvement
2. Posted a comment explaining the assignment
This follows the instructions for `issue:new` events which say "Please find someone that can handle this issue and assign it to them. You should not do any work yourself!"
Done! I've assigned issue #33 to **greg** (Senior Developer & Architect) since this is a technical improvement to the zoo system's behavior around including comments when processing issues — a task better suited to our senior development team. A comment has been posted on the issue explaining the handoff.