Status succeeded
Event issue:new on abrander/zoo#39
Agent leon leon

Log

Thinking
The user (abrander) has opened an issue requesting a feature to configure a list of repositories that the zoo system should watch, with wildcard support. This is a new feature request for the configuration system. Looking at my role as "Engineering Manager" and the other agents: - anna - no description provided - greg - Senior Developer & Architect - Expert in architecture, clean code and problem solving - mika - Junior Developer - Fast coder, loves clean code This is a feature implementation task that involves architecture decisions (how to structure the config, how to implement wildcard matching). This seems like it would be best handled by greg (Senior Developer & Architect) who can design the proper architecture for this feature. However, I should first understand what the project looks like to make sure I assign it correctly. Let me explore the project structure first.
I'll start by exploring the project to understand its current structure, then assign this feature request to the most suitable agent.
Tool 🔧 list_files {"path": "."}
{"path": "."}
drwxrwxr-x  5 1000 1000  4096 Aug 24 08:41 .
drwxr-xr-x  1 root root  4096 Aug 24 08:41 ..
drwxrwxr-x  8 1000 1000  4096 Aug 24 08:41 .git
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000    22 Aug 24 08:41 .gitignore
drwxrwxr-x  3 1000 1000  4096 Aug 24 08:41 cmd
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000  2628 Aug 24 08:41 go.mod
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 16578 Aug 24 08:41 go.sum
drwxrwxr-x 11 1000 1000  4096 Aug 24 08:41 internal
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000  1564 Aug 24 08:41 zoo.hcl.example
Thinking
This is a Go project. Let me look at the structure more to understand how configuration works currently.
Tool 🔧 list_files {"path": "internal"}
{"path": "internal"}
drwxrwxr-x 11 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 .
drwxrwxr-x  5 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 ..
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 agentrun
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 config
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 forgejo
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 livelog
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 llm
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 scheduler
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 store
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 tools
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 web
Tool 🔧 read_file {"end_line": 50, "path": "zoo.hcl.example", "start_line": 1}
{"end_line": 50, "path": "zoo.hcl.example", "start_line": 1}
{"path":"zoo.hcl.example","content":"# zoo.hcl - Configuration for the zoo daemon.\r\n#\r\n# Copy this file to zoo.hcl (gitignored) and fill in real values.\r\n\r\nllm \"Qwen 3.6\" {\r\n    openai = \"https://code.stdio.dk\"\r\n    token  = \"TOKEN\"\r\n    model  = \"Qwen3.6\"\r\n}\r\n\r\nllm \"Qwen 3.8\" {\r\n    openai = \"https://code.stdio.dk\"\r\n    token  = \"TOKEN\"\r\n    model  = \"Qwen3.8\"\r\n}\r\n\r\nforgejo {\r\n    url            = \"https://code.stdio.dk\"\r\n    token          = \"ZOO_SERVICE_TOKEN\"\r\n    # Shared secret configured on the Forgejo webhook. Required to accept\r\n    # webhook deliveries; polling works without it.\r\n    webhook_secret = \"EXAMPLE_WEBHOOK_SECRET\"\r\n}\r\n\r\nenvironment {\r\n    docker_image   = \"golang:latest\"\r\n    max_live_agents = 5\r\n}\r\n\r\nagent \"anna\" {\r\n    llm   = \"Qwen 3.6\"\r\n    token = \"ANNA_FORGEJO_TOKEN\"\r\n}\r\n\r\nagent \"greg\" {\r\n    llm   = \"Qwen 3.8\"\r\n    token = \"GREG_FORGEJO_TOKEN\"\r\n}\r\n\r\n# \"leon\" doubles as the expected Forgejo assignee username for\r\n# issue:assigned events - see the event block below.\r\nagent \"leon\" {\r\n    llm   = \"Qwen 3.8\"\r\n    token = \"LEON_FORGEJO_TOKEN\"\r\n}\r\n\r\nagent \"mika\" {\r\n    llm   = \"Qwen 3.6\"\r\n    token = \"MIKA_FORGEJO_TOKEN\"\r\n}\r","start_line":1,"end_line":50,"total_lines":70,"truncated":true}
Thinking
Let me look at the config package to understand how configuration is structured currently.
Tool 🔧 list_files {"path": "internal/config"}
{"path": "internal/config"}
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 .
drwxrwxr-x 11 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 ..
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 5356 Aug 24 08:41 config.go
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 4075 Aug 24 08:41 config_test.go
Thinking
Let me read the config.go to understand how configuration is structured.
Tool 🔧 read_file {"end_line": 150, "path": "internal/config/config.go", "start_line": 1}
{"end_line": 150, "path": "internal/config/config.go", "start_line": 1}
{"path":"internal/config/config.go","content":"// Package config loads and validates zoo's HCL configuration file.\r\npackage config\r\n\r\nimport (\r\n\t\"fmt\"\r\n\r\n\t\"github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2/hclsimple\"\r\n)\r\n\r\n// Known event kinds. issue:assigned is resolved dynamically (agent name\r\n// must match the Forgejo assignee's username) so it never carries an\r\n// `agent` attribute; the rest map statically to one configured agent.\r\nconst (\r\n\tEventIssueNew      = \"issue:new\"\r\n\tEventIssueComment  = \"issue:comment\"\r\n\tEventIssueAssigned = \"issue:assigned\"\r\n\tEventPRNew         = \"pr:new\"\r\n)\r\n\r\nvar staticEventKinds = map[string]bool{\r\n\tEventIssueNew:     true,\r\n\tEventIssueComment: true,\r\n\tEventPRNew:        true,\r\n}\r\n\r\ntype Config struct {\r\n\tLLMs        []LLM       `hcl:\"llm,block\"`\r\n\tForgejo     Forgejo     `hcl:\"forgejo,block\"`\r\n\tEnvironment Environment `hcl:\"environment,block\"`\r\n\tAgents      []Agent     `hcl:\"agent,block\"`\r\n\tEvents      []Event     `hcl:\"event,block\"`\r\n\tWeb         *Web        `hcl:\"web,block\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\n// Web configures the dashboard's optional bearer-token gate. Leave the\r\n// block out of zoo.hcl entirely to run without one (fine on localhost;\r\n// put a real gate or a proxy in front for anything else).\r\ntype Web struct {\r\n\tToken string `hcl:\"token,optional\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\ntype LLM struct {\r\n\tName   string `hcl:\"name,label\"`\r\n\tOpenAI string `hcl:\"openai\"`\r\n\tToken  string `hcl:\"token\"`\r\n\tModel  string `hcl:\"model\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\ntype Forgejo struct {\r\n\tURL           string `hcl:\"url\"`\r\n\tToken         string `hcl:\"token\"`\r\n\tWebhookSecret string `hcl:\"webhook_secret,optional\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\ntype Environment struct {\r\n\tDockerImage string `hcl:\"docker_image\"`\r\n\tMaxLive     int    `hcl:\"max_live_agents\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\ntype Agent struct {\r\n\tName  string `hcl:\"name,label\"`\r\n\tLLM   string `hcl:\"llm\"`\r\n\tToken string `hcl:\"token,optional\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\ntype Event struct {\r\n\tKind         string `hcl:\"name,label\"`\r\n\tAgent        string `hcl:\"agent,optional\"`\r\n\tInstructions string `hcl:\"instructions,optional\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\n// Load reads and validates the config file at path.\r\nfunc Load(path string) (*Config, error) {\r\n\tvar cfg Config\r\n\r\n\tif err := hclsimple.DecodeFile(path, nil, \u0026cfg); err != nil {\r\n\t\treturn nil, fmt.Errorf(\"parse config: %w\", err)\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tif err := cfg.Validate(); err != nil {\r\n\t\treturn nil, fmt.Errorf(\"invalid config: %w\", err)\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\treturn \u0026cfg, nil\r\n}\r\n\r\n// Validate checks that the config is internally consistent: every\r\n// reference between blocks resolves, and required values are set.\r\nfunc (c *Config) Validate() error {\r\n\tllmNames := make(map[string]bool, len(c.LLMs))\r\n\tfor _, l := range c.LLMs {\r\n\t\tif l.OpenAI == \"\" || l.Token == \"\" || l.Model == \"\" {\r\n\t\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"llm %q: openai, token, and model are required\", l.Name)\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t\tllmNames[l.Name] = true\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tif c.Forgejo.URL == \"\" || c.Forgejo.Token == \"\" {\r\n\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"forgejo: url and token are required\")\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tif c.Environment.MaxLive \u003c 1 {\r\n\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"environment: max_live_agents must be \u003e= 1, got %d\", c.Environment.MaxLive)\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tif c.Environment.DockerImage == \"\" {\r\n\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"environment: docker_image is required\")\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tagentNames := make(map[string]bool, len(c.Agents))\r\n\tfor _, a := range c.Agents {\r\n\t\tif !llmNames[a.LLM] {\r\n\t\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"agent %q: references undeclared llm %q\", a.Name, a.LLM)\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t\tagentNames[a.Name] = true\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tseenEventKinds := make(map[string]bool, len(c.Events))\r\n\tfor _, e := range c.Events {\r\n\t\tif seenEventKinds[e.Kind] {\r\n\t\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"event %q: declared more than once\", e.Kind)\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t\tseenEventKinds[e.Kind] = true\r\n\r\n\t\tswitch {\r\n\t\tcase e.Kind == EventIssueAssigned:\r\n\t\t\tif e.Agent != \"\" {\r\n\t\t\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"event %q: must not set agent; the agent whose name matches the Forgejo assignee's username is triggered dynamically\", e.Kind)\r\n\t\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\tcase staticEventKinds[e.Kind]:\r\n\t\t\tif e.Agent == \"\" {\r\n\t\t\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"event %q: agent is required\", e.Kind)\r\n\t\t\t}\r\n\t\t\tif !agentNames[e.Agent] {\r\n\t\t\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"event %q: references undeclared agent %q\", e.Kind, e.Agent)\r\n\t\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\tdefault:\r\n\t\t\treturn fmt.Errorf(\"event %q: unknown event kind\", e.Kind)\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\treturn nil\r\n}\r\n\r\n// AgentConfig holds an agent's full configuration including its\r\n// Forgejo token (if configured).\r\ntype AgentConfig struct {\r\n\tName  string\r","start_line":1,"end_line":150,"total_lines":204,"truncated":true}
Thinking
Let me see the rest of the config file and also look at how events are handled - particularly the scheduler or agentrun packages to understand where repository filtering would happen.
Tool 🔧 read_file {"end_line": 204, "path": "internal/config/config.go", "start_line": 150}
{"end_line": 204, "path": "internal/config/config.go", "start_line": 150}
{"path":"internal/config/config.go","content":"\tName  string\r\n\tLLM   string\r\n\tToken string\r\n}\r\n\r\n// AgentByName returns the agent config with the given name, if declared.\r\nfunc (c *Config) AgentByName(name string) (AgentConfig, bool) {\r\n\tfor _, a := range c.Agents {\r\n\t\tif a.Name == name {\r\n\t\t\treturn AgentConfig{\r\n\t\t\t\tName:  a.Name,\r\n\t\t\t\tLLM:   a.LLM,\r\n\t\t\t\tToken: a.Token,\r\n\t\t\t}, true\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\treturn AgentConfig{}, false\r\n}\r\n\r\n// LLMByName returns the llm config with the given name, if declared.\r\nfunc (c *Config) LLMByName(name string) (LLM, bool) {\r\n\tfor _, l := range c.LLMs {\r\n\t\tif l.Name == name {\r\n\t\t\treturn l, true\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\treturn LLM{}, false\r\n}\r\n\r\n// EventAgent returns the statically configured agent name for the given\r\n// event kind, if one is declared and set.\r\nfunc (c *Config) EventAgent(kind string) (string, bool) {\r\n\tfor _, e := range c.Events {\r\n\t\tif e.Kind == kind {\r\n\t\t\treturn e.Agent, e.Agent != \"\"\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\treturn \"\", false\r\n}\r\n\r\n// EventInstructions returns the configured freeform instructions for the\r\n// given event kind, e.g. \"Please review this pull request and respond\r\n// appropriately.\" Returns \"\" if the event isn't declared or has none.\r\nfunc (c *Config) EventInstructions(kind string) string {\r\n\tfor _, e := range c.Events {\r\n\t\tif e.Kind == kind {\r\n\t\t\treturn e.Instructions\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\treturn \"\"\r\n}\r","start_line":150,"end_line":204,"total_lines":204,"truncated":false}
Tool 🔧 list_files {"path": "internal/scheduler"}
{"path": "internal/scheduler"}
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 .
drwxrwxr-x 11 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 ..
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 7442 Aug 24 08:41 scheduler.go
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 8876 Aug 24 08:41 scheduler_test.go
Thinking
Let me look at the scheduler to understand how events are currently processed and where repository filtering would fit.
Tool 🔧 read_file {"end_line": 100, "path": "internal/scheduler/scheduler.go", "start_line": 1}
{"end_line": 100, "path": "internal/scheduler/scheduler.go", "start_line": 1}
{"path":"internal/scheduler/scheduler.go","content":"// Package scheduler resolves incoming Forgejo events to configured\r\n// agents and runs them, bounded by max_live_agents.\r\npackage scheduler\r\n\r\nimport (\r\n\t\"context\"\r\n\t\"errors\"\r\n\t\"fmt\"\r\n\t\"log/slog\"\r\n\t\"sync\"\r\n\r\n\t\"github.com/google/uuid\"\r\n\r\n\t\"github.com/abrander/zoo/internal/config\"\r\n\t\"github.com/abrander/zoo/internal/forgejo\"\r\n\t\"github.com/abrander/zoo/internal/livelog\"\r\n\t\"github.com/abrander/zoo/internal/store\"\r\n)\r\n\r\n// forgejoActions is the narrow slice of Client the scheduler needs for\r\n// its own failure-reporting side effects (defined here, not in\r\n// internal/forgejo, so tests can inject a fake).\r\ntype forgejoActions interface {\r\n\tCreateIssueComment(owner, repo string, index int64, body string) error\r\n\tAddLabel(owner, repo string, index int64, name string) error\r\n}\r\n\r\n// FailureLabel is applied to the triggering issue/PR, alongside a\r\n// comment, whenever an agent run fails or times out.\r\nconst FailureLabel = \"zoo:failed\"\r\n\r\n// Runner runs a single agent invocation to completion. Implemented by\r\n// internal/agentrun.Run; a narrow interface here so the scheduler is\r\n// testable without Docker.\r\ntype Runner interface {\r\n\tRun(ctx context.Context, jobID string, agent config.AgentConfig, llm config.LLM, dockerImage string, ev forgejo.Event) error\r\n}\r\n\r\ntype Scheduler struct {\r\n\tcfg     *config.Config\r\n\tstore   *store.Store\r\n\tforgejo forgejoActions\r\n\trunner  Runner\r\n\thub     *livelog.Hub\r\n\tlogger  *slog.Logger\r\n\r\n\tsem chan struct{}\r\n\twg  sync.WaitGroup\r\n}\r\n\r\nfunc New(cfg *config.Config, st *store.Store, fg forgejoActions, runner Runner, hub *livelog.Hub, logger *slog.Logger) *Scheduler {\r\n\treturn \u0026Scheduler{\r\n\t\tcfg:     cfg,\r\n\t\tstore:   st,\r\n\t\tforgejo: fg,\r\n\t\trunner:  runner,\r\n\t\thub:     hub,\r\n\t\tlogger:  logger,\r\n\t\tsem:     make(chan struct{}, cfg.Environment.MaxLive),\r\n\t}\r\n}\r\n\r\n// resolveAgent returns the name of the agent that should handle ev, if\r\n// any. issue:assigned resolves dynamically: the agent whose config label\r\n// matches the Forgejo assignee's username. Every other event kind uses\r\n// the static event-\u003eagent mapping from config.\r\nfunc resolveAgent(cfg *config.Config, ev forgejo.Event) (string, bool) {\r\n\tif ev.Kind == config.EventIssueAssigned {\r\n\t\tif _, ok := cfg.AgentByName(ev.Assignee); ok {\r\n\t\t\treturn ev.Assignee, true\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\treturn \"\", false\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\treturn cfg.EventAgent(ev.Kind)\r\n}\r\n\r\n// Run consumes events until ctx is canceled or the channel closes,\r\n// dispatching each to its resolved agent and blocking on the\r\n// max_live_agents semaphore before starting a run.\r\nfunc (s *Scheduler) Run(ctx context.Context, events \u003c-chan forgejo.Event) {\r\n\tfor {\r\n\t\tselect {\r\n\t\tcase \u003c-ctx.Done():\r\n\t\t\treturn\r\n\r\n\t\tcase ev, ok := \u003c-events:\r\n\t\t\tif !ok {\r\n\t\t\t\treturn\r\n\t\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\t\ts.handle(ctx, ev)\r\n\t\t}\r\n\t}\r\n}\r\n\r\nfunc (s *Scheduler) handle(ctx context.Context, ev forgejo.Event) {\r\n\tagentName, ok := resolveAgent(s.cfg, ev)\r\n\tif !ok {\r","start_line":1,"end_line":100,"total_lines":241,"truncated":true}
Thinking
Let me continue reading the scheduler to understand where events are filtered.
Tool 🔧 read_file {"end_line": 241, "path": "internal/scheduler/scheduler.go", "start_line": 100}
{"end_line": 241, "path": "internal/scheduler/scheduler.go", "start_line": 100}
{"path":"internal/scheduler/scheduler.go","content":"\tif !ok {\r\n\t\ts.logger.Debug(\"no agent resolved for event, dropping\", \"kind\", ev.Kind, \"owner\", ev.Owner, \"repo\", ev.Repo, \"index\", ev.Index)\r\n\t\treturn\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\t// An agent's own actions (e.g. a comment posted via the `comment`\r\n\t// tool, authenticated with its own per-agent token) can themselves\r\n\t// show up as new events. Don't let an agent trigger itself off its\r\n\t// own activity — that's a self-reinforcing loop, not new work.\r\n\tif ev.Author != \"\" \u0026\u0026 ev.Author == agentName {\r\n\t\ts.logger.Debug(\"dropping event authored by the agent it would trigger\", \"kind\", ev.Kind, \"agent\", agentName, \"owner\", ev.Owner, \"repo\", ev.Repo, \"index\", ev.Index)\r\n\t\treturn\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tagent, ok := s.cfg.AgentByName(agentName)\r\n\tif !ok {\r\n\t\ts.logger.Error(\"resolved agent not declared in config\", \"agent\", agentName)\r\n\t\treturn\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tllm, ok := s.cfg.LLMByName(agent.LLM)\r\n\tif !ok {\r\n\t\ts.logger.Error(\"agent references undeclared llm\", \"agent\", agentName, \"llm\", agent.LLM)\r\n\t\treturn\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tjobID := uuid.NewString()\r\n\r\n\tif err := s.store.CreateJob(ctx, store.Job{\r\n\t\tID:         jobID,\r\n\t\tEventKind:  ev.Kind,\r\n\t\tAgent:      agentName,\r\n\t\tOwner:      ev.Owner,\r\n\t\tRepo:       ev.Repo,\r\n\t\tIssueIndex: ev.Index,\r\n\t\tTitle:      ev.Title,\r\n\t}); err != nil {\r\n\t\ts.logger.Error(\"failed to record job\", \"job\", jobID, \"error\", err)\r\n\t\treturn\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tselect {\r\n\tcase s.sem \u003c- struct{}{}:\r\n\r\n\tcase \u003c-ctx.Done():\r\n\t\treturn\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\ts.wg.Add(1)\r\n\r\n\tgo func() {\r\n\t\tdefer s.wg.Done()\r\n\t\tdefer func() { \u003c-s.sem }()\r\n\r\n\t\ts.run(ctx, jobID, agent, llm, ev)\r\n\t}()\r\n}\r\n\r\nfunc (s *Scheduler) run(ctx context.Context, jobID string, agent config.AgentConfig, llm config.LLM, ev forgejo.Event) {\r\n\tlogger := s.logger.With(\"job\", jobID, \"agent\", agent.Name, \"event\", ev.Kind, \"owner\", ev.Owner, \"repo\", ev.Repo, \"index\", ev.Index)\r\n\r\n\t// Job status writes use a context detached from ctx, not ctx itself:\r\n\t// ctx is canceled on daemon shutdown to unwind the in-flight run, and\r\n\t// an already-canceled ctx would make these UPDATEs fail instantly,\r\n\t// leaving the job stuck at \"running\" forever even though the process\r\n\t// has exited.\r\n\tif err := s.store.MarkJobStarted(context.Background(), jobID); err != nil {\r\n\t\tlogger.Error(\"failed to mark job started\", \"error\", err)\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tlogger.Info(\"agent run starting\")\r\n\r\n\terr := s.runner.Run(ctx, jobID, agent, llm, s.cfg.Environment.DockerImage, ev)\r\n\r\n\tstatus := store.JobSucceeded\r\n\terrMsg := \"\"\r\n\r\n\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\terrMsg = err.Error()\r\n\t\t// The daemon-wide ctx passed in here isn't what times a run out\r\n\t\t// (agentrun.Runner.Run applies its own per-run deadline\r\n\t\t// internally); a timed-out run surfaces as a wrapped\r\n\t\t// context.DeadlineExceeded in the returned error instead.\r\n\t\tif errors.Is(err, context.DeadlineExceeded) {\r\n\t\t\tstatus = store.JobTimedOut\r\n\t\t} else {\r\n\t\t\tstatus = store.JobFailed\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\tlogger.Error(\"agent run failed\", \"status\", status, \"error\", err)\r\n\t\ts.reportFailure(ev, status, err)\r\n\t} else {\r\n\t\tlogger.Info(\"agent run succeeded\")\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tif err := s.store.MarkJobFinished(context.Background(), jobID, status, errMsg); err != nil {\r\n\t\tlogger.Error(\"failed to mark job finished\", \"error\", err)\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\t// Closing the hub here, only after the terminal status is durably\r\n\t// written, is what lets a dashboard tab's auto-reload (triggered by\r\n\t// this Close) see the finished status immediately. Closing it inside\r\n\t// Runner.Run instead — before this status write — raced a fast\r\n\t// reload against MarkJobFinished: the reloaded page could still see\r\n\t// \"running\", open a fresh SSE subscription against a hub entry that\r\n\t// no longer exists, and be stuck showing a stale status forever.\r\n\ts.hub.Close(jobID)\r\n}\r\n\r\n// reportFailure implements the locked-in failure policy: comment on the\r\n// triggering issue/PR with an error summary, and apply FailureLabel.\r\nfunc (s *Scheduler) reportFailure(ev forgejo.Event, status store.JobStatus, runErr error) {\r\n\tbody := fmt.Sprintf(\"zoo agent run %s: %s\", status, runErr.Error())\r\n\r\n\tif err := s.forgejo.CreateIssueComment(ev.Owner, ev.Repo, ev.Index, body); err != nil {\r\n\t\ts.logger.Error(\"failed to post failure comment\", \"owner\", ev.Owner, \"repo\", ev.Repo, \"index\", ev.Index, \"error\", err)\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tif err := s.forgejo.AddLabel(ev.Owner, ev.Repo, ev.Index, FailureLabel); err != nil {\r\n\t\ts.logger.Error(\"failed to add failure label\", \"owner\", ev.Owner, \"repo\", ev.Repo, \"index\", ev.Index, \"error\", err)\r\n\t}\r\n}\r\n\r\n// Shutdown stops accepting new work is the caller's responsibility (stop\r\n// feeding Run's channel); Shutdown just waits for in-flight runs, up to\r\n// ctx's deadline.\r\nfunc (s *Scheduler) Shutdown(ctx context.Context) error {\r\n\tdone := make(chan struct{})\r\n\r\n\tgo func() {\r\n\t\ts.wg.Wait()\r\n\t\tclose(done)\r\n\t}()\r\n\r\n\tselect {\r\n\tcase \u003c-done:\r\n\t\treturn nil\r\n\r\n\tcase \u003c-ctx.Done():\r\n\t\treturn ctx.Err()\r\n\t}\r\n}\r","start_line":100,"end_line":241,"total_lines":241,"truncated":false}
Thinking
Now let me look at the forgejo package to understand how events are received and where repository filtering would happen.
Tool 🔧 list_files {"path": "internal/forgejo"}
{"path": "internal/forgejo"}
drwxrwxr-x  2 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 .
drwxrwxr-x 11 1000 1000 4096 Aug 24 08:41 ..
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 9787 Aug 24 08:41 client.go
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 3356 Aug 24 08:41 client_test.go
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 1117 Aug 24 08:41 event.go
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 5921 Aug 24 08:41 poll.go
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 1784 Aug 24 08:41 watcher.go
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 6040 Aug 24 08:41 webhook.go
-rw-rw-r--  1 1000 1000 4922 Aug 24 08:41 webhook_test.go
Thinking
Let me look at the event.go and webhook.go to understand how events are received and where repository filtering would fit.
Tool 🔧 read_file {"end_line": 100, "path": "internal/forgejo/webhook.go", "start_line": 1}
{"end_line": 100, "path": "internal/forgejo/webhook.go", "start_line": 1}
{"path":"internal/forgejo/webhook.go","content":"package forgejo\r\n\r\nimport (\r\n\t\"encoding/json\"\r\n\t\"fmt\"\r\n\t\"io\"\r\n\t\"log/slog\"\r\n\t\"net/http\"\r\n\t\"time\"\r\n\r\n\tsdk \"codeberg.org/mvdkleijn/forgejo-sdk/forgejo/v2\"\r\n)\r\n\r\ntype issuePayload struct {\r\n\tAction     string          `json:\"action\"`\r\n\tIssue      *sdk.Issue      `json:\"issue\"`\r\n\tRepository *sdk.Repository `json:\"repository\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\ntype issueCommentPayload struct {\r\n\tAction     string          `json:\"action\"`\r\n\tIssue      *sdk.Issue      `json:\"issue\"`\r\n\tComment    *sdk.Comment    `json:\"comment\"`\r\n\tRepository *sdk.Repository `json:\"repository\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\ntype pullRequestPayload struct {\r\n\tAction      string           `json:\"action\"`\r\n\tPullRequest *sdk.PullRequest `json:\"pull_request\"`\r\n\tRepository  *sdk.Repository  `json:\"repository\"`\r\n}\r\n\r\n// WebhookHandler returns the http.Handler to mount at (e.g.)\r\n// /webhooks/forgejo. If secret is non-empty, deliveries are verified via\r\n// the SDK's X-Forgejo-Signature middleware; callers should always set a\r\n// secret for anything reachable off localhost.\r\nfunc WebhookHandler(secret string, logger *slog.Logger, emit func(Event)) http.Handler {\r\n\thandler := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {\r\n\t\tbody, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body)\r\n\t\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\t\thttp.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusBadRequest)\r\n\t\t\treturn\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\tkind := r.Header.Get(\"X-Forgejo-Event\")\r\n\t\tif kind == \"\" {\r\n\t\t\tkind = r.Header.Get(\"X-Gitea-Event\")\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\tev, ok, err := decodeWebhookEvent(kind, body)\r\n\t\tif err != nil {\r\n\t\t\tlogger.Warn(\"failed to decode webhook payload\", \"event\", kind, \"error\", err)\r\n\t\t\thttp.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusBadRequest)\r\n\t\t\treturn\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\tif ok {\r\n\t\t\temit(ev)\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\tw.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK)\r\n\t})\r\n\r\n\tif secret == \"\" {\r\n\t\tlogger.Warn(\"forgejo webhook_secret is not set; incoming webhook deliveries are not authenticated\")\r\n\r\n\t\treturn handler\r\n\t}\r\n\r\n\treturn sdk.VerifyWebhookSignatureMiddleware(secret)(handler)\r\n}\r\n\r\nfunc decodeWebhookEvent(kind string, body []byte) (Event, bool, error) {\r\n\tswitch kind {\r\n\tcase \"issues\":\r\n\t\tvar p issuePayload\r\n\r\n\t\tif err := json.Unmarshal(body, \u0026p); err != nil {\r\n\t\t\treturn Event{}, false, err\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\treturn issueEvent(p, body)\r\n\r\n\tcase \"issue_comment\":\r\n\t\tvar p issueCommentPayload\r\n\r\n\t\tif err := json.Unmarshal(body, \u0026p); err != nil {\r\n\t\t\treturn Event{}, false, err\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\treturn issueCommentEvent(p, body)\r\n\r\n\tcase \"pull_request\":\r\n\t\tvar p pullRequestPayload\r\n\r\n\t\tif err := json.Unmarshal(body, \u0026p); err != nil {\r\n\t\t\treturn Event{}, false, err\r\n\t\t}\r\n\r\n\t\treturn pullRequestEvent(p, body)\r","start_line":1,"end_line":100,"total_lines":237,"truncated":true}
Tool 🔧 read_file {"end_line": 50, "path": "internal/forgejo/event.go", "start_line": 1}
{"end_line": 50, "path": "internal/forgejo/event.go", "start_line": 1}
{"path":"internal/forgejo/event.go","content":"package forgejo\r\n\r\nimport \"encoding/json\"\r\n\r\n// Event kinds, matching the values used as event block labels in\r\n// config.Config (config avoids importing this package, so the kind\r\n// strings are duplicated by value, not by identity).\r\nconst (\r\n\tEventIssueNew      = \"issue:new\"\r\n\tEventIssueComment  = \"issue:comment\"\r\n\tEventIssueAssigned = \"issue:assigned\"\r\n\tEventPRNew         = \"pr:new\"\r\n)\r\n\r\n// Event is the normalized shape produced by both the webhook receiver and\r\n// the polling fallback, and is what the scheduler dispatches on.\r\ntype Event struct {\r\n\tKind string\r\n\r\n\t// ID uniquely identifies this event for dedup, regardless of whether\r\n\t// it arrived via webhook or polling.\r\n\tID string\r\n\r\n\tOwner, Repo string\r\n\tIndex       int64 // issue or PR number\r\n\r\n\tTitle, Body string\r\n\tAuthor      string\r\n\r\n\t// Assignee is set for EventIssueAssigned: the Forgejo username the\r\n\t// issue was assigned to.\r\n\tAssignee string\r\n\r\n\t// Comment is set for EventIssueComment.\r\n\tComment string\r\n\r\n\t// Raw is the full source payload (webhook body, or a synthesized\r\n\t// equivalent when polling), written to /event in the agent container.\r\n\tRaw json.RawMessage\r\n}\r","start_line":1,"end_line":40,"total_lines":40,"truncated":false}
Thinking
Now I have a good understanding of the project. This is a Go-based system that: 1. Receives events from Forgejo (via webhooks or polling) 2. Resolves which agent should handle each event 3. Runs agents in Docker containers The issue requests adding a configuration option to filter which repositories zoo should watch, with wildcard support (e.g., "organisation/*" or "*"). This would need to be implemented in: 1. The config package - add a `Repositories` field to the Config struct 2. The forgejo package - filter events based on the repository list before emitting them 3. The scheduler - potentially also filter there as a safety net This is an architectural feature that involves: - Design decisions about the config format and wildcard matching - Changes to multiple packages - Potentially affecting the webhook handler, poller, and scheduler Given the other agents: - **greg** - Senior Developer & Architect - Expert in architecture, clean code and problem solving. This seems like the right person for this architectural change. - **mika** - Junior Developer - Fast coder, but this requires architectural thinking - **anna** - No description provided This task is clearly best suited for greg who is the Senior Developer & Architect. They can design the proper solution for repository filtering with wildcard support across the system. Let me assign this to greg.
Based on my exploration of the project, this is a feature request to add repository filtering to zoo's configuration — allowing users to specify which repositories zoo should watch, with wildcard support (e.g., `organisation/*` or `*`). This requires architectural changes across multiple packages: - **config**: Add a `Repositories` field with validation - **forgejo**: Filter incoming events (webhook and poll) against the configured repo list - **scheduler**: Possibly add a secondary filter as a safety net This is an architectural feature requiring thoughtful design decisions about wildcard matching, config structure, and where filtering should occur. It's best handled by the Senior Developer & Architect.
Tool 🔧 assign_issue {"agent": "greg"}
{"agent": "greg"}
Assigned to greg
Thinking
I've assigned the issue to greg. Now I should leave a comment explaining what I did and why.
Tool 🔧 comment {"body": "Assigned this to **greg** (Senior Developer & Architect) since this feature requires architectural decisions across multiple packages:\n\n- Adding repository filtering configuration (`zoo.hcl`)\n- Wildcard matching logic (`organisation/*`, `*`)\n- Filtering in the webhook handler, poller, or both\n\nGreg can design the proper solution for how and where to apply the repository filter."}
{"body": "Assigned this to **greg** (Senior Developer & Architect) since this feature requires architectural decisions across multiple packages:\n\n- Adding repository filtering configuration (`zoo.hcl`)\n- Wildcard matching logic (`organisation/*`, `*`)\n- Filtering in the webhook handler, poller, or both\n\nGreg can design the proper solution for how and where to apply the repository filter."}
Comment posted
Thinking
I've successfully assigned the issue to greg and left a comment explaining why. The task is now with the appropriate agent who can handle the architectural design and implementation of the repository filtering feature.
Done! I've: 1. **Explored the project** — reviewed the codebase structure, config system, and event handling pipeline in `internal/config`, `internal/forgejo`, and `internal/scheduler`. 2. **Assigned to greg** — This feature requires architectural decisions about where and how to filter repositories (config schema, wildcard matching, webhook/poll filtering), which aligns with greg's role as Senior Developer & Architect. 3. **Left a comment** on the issue explaining the assignment rationale.